• About
    • About This Website
    • About Me
    • FAQ’s
    • Leaving Comments / Contact

The Post-Capitalist Society

A Historical Materialist Perspective

  • Home
  • The Robot Economy
  • Slouching Towards Dystopia
  • The Excellent Situation

Excerpts from The Communist Manifesto

December 3, 2015 by Admin Leave a Comment

From The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels (1848):

 

The bourgeoisie, during its rule of scarce one hundred years, has created more massive and more colossal productive forces than have all preceding generations together. Subjugation of nature’s forces to man, machinery, application of chemistry to industry and agriculture, steam navigation, railways, electric telegraphs, clearing of whole continents for cultivation, canalization of rivers, whole populations conjured out of the ground — what earlier century had even a presentiment that such productive forces slumbered in the lap of social labor?

We see then: the means of production and of exchange, on whose foundation the bourgeoisie built itself up, were generated in feudal society. At a certain stage in the development of these means of production and of exchange, the conditions under which feudal society produced and exchanged, the feudal organization of agriculture and manufacturing industry,in one word, the feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces; they became so many fetters. They had to be burst asunder; they were burst asunder.

Into their place stepped free competition, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted to it, and the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class.

A similar movement is going on before our own eyes. Modern bourgeois society, with its relations of production, of exchange and of property, a society that has conjured up such gigantic means of production and of exchange, is like the sorcerer who is no longer able to control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by his spells…

…The productive forces at the disposal of society no longer tend to further the development of the conditions of bourgeois property; on the contrary, they have become too powerful for these conditions, by which they are fettered, and so soon as they overcome these fetters, they bring disorder into the whole of bourgeois society, endanger the existence of bourgeois property…

…The weapons with which the bourgeoisie felled feudalism to the ground are now turned against the bourgeoisie itself.

But not only has the bourgeoisie forged the weapons that bring death to itself; it has also called into existence the men who are to wield those weapons — the modern working class — the proletarians.

 

Oh, so , so close! The analysis of Marx and Engels is spot on right up to this last sentence. But surely they can be forgiven this misunderstanding. How could these men foresee, in 1848, that the “weapons” the bourgeoisie forged would spring to life, as if by sorcerous incantation, and wield themselves – no proletarians required? Alternately, we might allow that since the robots ultimately supplant the proletariat’s form and  function in the capitalist mode of production, Marx and Engels stand strangely vindicated.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Something to Think About:

The growing perception that existing social institutions are unreasonable and unjust, that reason has become unreason, and right wrong, is only proof that in the modes of production and exchange changes have silently taken place with which the social order, adapted to earlier economic conditions, is no longer in keeping -

Friedrich Engels, Socialism: Utopian and Scientific

Modern bourgeois society, with its relations of production, of exchange and of property, a society that has conjured up such gigantic means of production and of exchange, is like the sorcerer who is no longer able to control the powers of the netherworld whom he has called up by his spells.

-Marx and Engels

The Sane Society

Man today is confronted with the most fundamental choice; not that between Capitalism and Communism, but that between robotism (of both the capitalist and communist variety), or Humanistic Communitarian Socialism. Most facts seem to indicate that he is choosing robotism, and that means, in the long run, insanity and destruction. But all these facts are not strong enough to destroy faith in man's reason, good will, and sanity. As long as we can think of other alternatives, we are not lost; as long as we can consult together and plan together, we can hope. But, indeed, the shadows are lengthening; the voices of insanity are becoming louder. We are in reach of achieving a state of humanity which corresponds to the vision of our great teachers; yet we are in danger of the destruction of all civilization, or of robotization.

- Erich Fromm, The Sane Society (1955)

The theories of social development in the West - those of Werner Sombart, Max Weber, Emil Lederer, Joseph Schumpeter, Raymond Aron - are, as I try to show, "dialogues" with these different schemata of Marx.

- Daniel Bell, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting.

On Historical Materialism:

In the social production of their life, men enter into definite relations that are indispensable and independent of their will, relations of production which correspond to a definite stage of development of their material productive forces. The sum total of these relations of production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real foundation, on which rises a legal and political superstructure and to which correspond definite forms of social consciousness... It is not the consciousness of men that determines their social being, but, on the contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness.

- Karl Marx

Or, To Put It Another Way:

Things economic and social move by their own momentum and the ensuing situations compel individuals and groups to behave in certain ways whatever they may wish to do - not indeed by destroying their freedom of choice but by shaping the choosing mentalities and by limiting the list of possibilities from which to choose. If this is the quintessence of Marxism then we have all of us got to be Marxist.

- Joseph A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy

The ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed, the world is ruled by little else. Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist....Soon or late, it is ideas, not vested interests, which are dangerous for good or evil.

- John Maynard Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money

Creative Commons License
Original articles on postcapitalistsociety.net are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Recent Posts

  • Basic Income: Our Birthright or A Mess of Pottage?
  • Two Key Sentences
  • Friedrich Engels on Historical Materialism
  • Universal Basic Income: Insight From Historical Materialism
  • Universal Basic Income and the Politics of Production

Recent Comments

  • Richard Symonds on Paul Mason: PostCapitalism: A Guide to Our Future

Archives

  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015

Categories

  • Featured Image
  • Featured Posts
  • Historical Materialism
  • History of Ideas
  • Library
  • Marx
  • RoR
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in